Description: This lawsuit claims that The Economist Newspaper NA violated Michigan’s Preservation of Personal Privacy Act by disclosing information related to its customers’ magazine subscriptions to third parties before July 30, 2016. The Defendant denies it violated any law. However, the Parties have agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid the uncertainties and expenses associated with ongoing litigation.
class action lawsuit (28) class action settlement (18) michigan’s preservation of personal privacy act (4) kain v. the economist newspaper na (1) davis wright tremaine llp. (1) jnd legal administration (1) michigan street address (1) economist newspaper (1) inc; bursor & fisher p.a. case no. 4:21-cv-11807-mfl-ci.
If you had a Michigan street address and subscribed to a The Economist Publication to be delivered to a Michigan street address or electronically between February 4, 2015, and July 30, 2016, you may be entitled to a payment.
This lawsuit claims that Defendant violated Michigan’s Preservation of Personal Privacy Act, H.B. 5331, 84th Leg. Reg. Sess., P.A. No. 378 §§ 1-4, id. § 5, added by H.B. 4694, 85th Leg. Reg. Sess., P.A. No. 206, § 1 (Mich. 1989) (the “PPPA”), by disclosing information related to its customers’ magazine subscriptions to third parties before July 30, 2016. The Defendant denies it violated any law. The Court has not determined who is right. Rather, the Parties have agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid the unc
The Court decided that everyone who fits the following description is a member of the Settlement Class :